Custom type priority when SRFLX candidates are used

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Benny,

> You're right, it's violating the spec. I just fixed this in r3101
> (basically swapped the SRFLX and PRFLX priority values).
>

Ok, I can see the fix, but could you please explain me why do we want to 
swap the priorities when using STUN and not keep the host candidate as 
the highest priority? I'm a bit confused about it :)


Thanks!

-- 
Sa?l Ibarra Corretg?
AG Projects



[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk Users]     [Asterisk App Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux