C?dric,
I think I got the answer for your old question.
How did you add Route Header into pjsip_msg?
After pjsip_endpt_create_request(), I used
pjsip_generic_string_hdr_create() to create a hdr for route and add it
into tdata->msg. Yes, sip message sent by pjsip has correct Route
Header. But pjsip_process_route_set() can't get this when counting
target because pjsip_msg_find_hdr() is used PJSIP_H_ROUTE to lookup.
So I think you made the same mistake. The code of pjsip is ok.
regards,
Gang
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Gang Liu <gangban.lau at gmail.com> wrote:
> sorry, I make a mistake. Ignore it.
>
> regards,
> Gang
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Gang Liu <gangban.lau at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi benny,
>> ??? When I try pjsip_endpt_send_request_stateless() function today, I
>> got the same issue which
>> C?dric. reported before.
>>
>> http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/2008-November/005565.html
>>
>> ? pjsip_process_route_set() function select request URI as target
>> when topmostRoute is loose route.But It should be URI from
>> topmostRoute. After change below code to use topmost_route_uri, the
>> trarget is correct.
>> ...
>> ? ? ? ?if (has_lr_param) {
>> ? ? ? ? ? ?new_request_uri = tdata->msg->line.req.uri;
>> ? ? ? ? ? ?^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> ? ? ? ? ? ?/* We shouldn't need to delete topmost Route if it has lr
>> param.
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? * But seems like it breaks some proxy implementation, so we
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? * delete it anyway.
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? */
>> ? ? ? ? ? ?/*
>> ? ? ? ? ? ?pj_list_erase(first_route_hdr);
>> ? ? ? ? ? ?if (first_route_hdr == last_route_hdr)
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?last_route_hdr = NULL;
>> ? ? ? ? ? ?*/
>> ? ? ? ?} else {
>> ? ? ? ? ? ?new_request_uri = (const pjsip_uri*)
>> ...
>>
>> regards,
>> Gang
>
>
