Do you have nat traversal or contact fixing turned on on your SER? This may be fine and may not affect any features since SER may be storing the "fixed contact". If you don't like any of this, then use STUN with pjsip. We know for a fact that SER and OpenSER work perfectly fine with pjsip. In fact better than with other SIP stacks! On Jan 28, 2008 10:49 AM, Philippe <philippe.leuba at eyepmedia.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > We discovered that PJ stack is not compatible with SER. This is may be > caused by the changes done in the bug fix #371. > > > > This is due to the fact that SER do not provide the same contact in the > response that in the REGISTER: > > > > REGISTER sip:proxy01.sipphone.com;transport=UDP SIP/2.0 > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.41:1637 > ;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjbbd860b613154a5eaa9fabf99c1c3ace > > Contact: <sip:17472769426 at 192.168.1.41:1637;transport=UDP> > > ? > > > > > > SIP/2.0 200 OK > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.41:1637 > ;rport=7912;branch=z9hG4bKPjbbd860b613154a5eaa9fabf99c1c3ace;received= > 81.63.143.178 > > Contact: <sip:17472769426 at 81.63.143.178:7912;transport=UDP>;expires=1800 > > ? > > > > > > I agree that the SER behavior is not standard. > > > > What can be do to solve the issue? > > > > Philippe Leuba > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > -- Medhavi Bhatia CTO, 3CLogic www.3clogic.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20080128/04ab468a/attachment.html
