Benny Prijono wrote: > On 1/27/08, Benny Prijono <bennylp at pjsip.org> wrote: > >> On 1/27/08, Benny Prijono <bennylp at pjsip.org> wrote: >> >>>> 4. Thread B, still trying to lock stream->jb_mutex, segfaults because >>>> thread A deallocated stream->jb_mutex and zeroed out the pointer. >>>> >>>> >>>> I have been trying to follow the code and it almost looks like this is >>>> possible. Can anyone confirm or disprove this? >>>> >>>> >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> I've got to say that the scenario looks valid, rather unfortunately. I >>> haven't had idea on how to solve it though. >>> >>> >> Forgot one thing. I just registered your report in the ticket list for >> now: http://trac.pjsip.org/repos/ticket/460 >> >> > > Just to let you know that I think I've got this fixed now. Please see > ticket #460 URL above for more information. Thanks for the report! > Looks better than my solutions. As far as the DTMF callback is concerned, I think that the timeout in the acquire_call function should be enough to cover our butts. Agreed? Thanks Benny, -- Michael Broughton, Advanis Unintended Recipient & Unauthorized Use of E-Mail: This message and attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that is intended only for the named recipient of this e-mail. Any unauthorized use or distribution is not permitted. If you have received this e-mail in error, deleting the e-mail and notifying the sender would be appreciated. Thank you.
