Philippe HENSEL wrote: > Some words about Linux NAT done with iptables MASQUERADE : > > - STUN public address/port resolution is non sense for Symmetric NAT > because it changes for each different destination address/port. > So when pjsip detects Symmetric NAT it is not recommend to use > the resolved public adress/port. > > - Linux standard NAT does not have ALG function because there is > a specific module for it :http://www.iptel.org/sipalg/ > > What do you think about this Benny ? > Hi! I am not Benny, but I am interested in the "NAT with iptables" topic. Have you managed to implement Symmetric NAT with iptables? If so, how did you did it? Best Regards Pedro Gon?alves
