"Micah Stevens" <micah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:200502251344.34389.micah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > With mysql 4.1 you could union and then subSelect maybe? I'm not > super-familiar with sub selects, so this code won't likely run.. There is a unwritten rule that states: "If your db needs the use of unions the db is set up poorly." You can union just about everything, that's the whole problem of a union. I would not and I do mean not ever use a union in my code. I woudl need more detail on the schema to give a more abt answer to the problem. > > But then, you're runn 4.0x so it won't run anyway. :) > > > select city_id, count(city_id) as num from > ((select city_id from members) > UNION > (select city_id from pictures) > UNION > (select city_id from reports)) > order by num > > > > > > On Friday 25 February 2005 07:08 am, Merlin wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > I am trying to do a tricky task with PHP and MySQl 4.0.x > > > > There are 3 content tables where each of them contains a city_id > > and there is a 4th table which holds the city_id and the acording city_name > > > > Now I would like to find out the most used city names. > > > > For example: > > > > members pictures reports > > 3 4 3 > > 2 9 8 > > 9 8 8 > > > > So the most used city_ids are > > 8 > > 3 > > 9 > > > > To find this out would be a chelenging task, but to merge them with the > > city name is even more difficult > > > > I am working on this quite a while now and cant find a way. Maybe someone > > of you guys could give me a smart push. > > > > Thank you for any help, > > > > Merlin -- PHP Database Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
