On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Mogens Melander <mogens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Why is that? What's wrong with extensions? > > I, personal, like optional stuff. > I agree. > > On 2015-10-15 12:07, Lin Yo-An wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I started this project for adding extra array support in extension, if >>> you have >>> any idea about the missing pieces for array, please let me know. >>> Thanks! >>> >>> xarray - The missing array functions you are looking for, implemented in >>> Extension https://github.com/c9s/xarray >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Yo-An Lin >>> >> A few comments on this project... array_pluck is in the language, called array_column array_remove is just array_filter, why do I need another function for that? array_add - why do I need the overhead of a function call, when I can do $a[ *key*] = *value* array_build - this seems neat, but I think it needs a better example, I can do the example already with array_combine(array_column(), array_column()) array_each - this is just a foreach with an isolated scope and function overhead on every iteration, why would I want that? array_keys_join - while I like this, why doesn't it have the same argument order as implode/join (glue, array)? array_keys_prefix, array_first, array_is_assoc, array_is_indexed - I like these :) PS. please respect the guidelines of the mailing list and do not top post.[1] [1] http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.git;a=blob_plain;f=README.MAILINGLIST_RULES;hb=HEAD
