Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Aziz Saleh. > In reply to Your message dated Friday, July 18, 2014, 17:42:39, > >> It is not. Windows itself has ended supporting Windows XP (You are >> currently unprotected from new vulnerabilities), why do you expect the same >> from Zend? > > Flashing marketing statements do not work on me. I see this discussion pointless. Well, actually *you* may be pointless. You demand latest PHP versions to support Windows XP, but apparently you don't demand support for Windows 3.1 or DOS 7.0. Why not? Isn't it worthwhile to also support these systems? Where is the limit? > PHP disappointing me more and more. There are many other languages out there--just pick the one you like. > Site is barely functional, documentation > usability reduced to ashes in past few years, even more with CHM version of > documentation I've recently downloaded - it's illegible (white on gray? Who > was the id..genius, who changed the color scheme). There is <https://bugs.php.net/> to report such issues. > And all the sugar candy > "features" implemented in recent PHP development, instead of highly demanded > and largely already present, but scattered actual features. (I.e. automatic > conversion of errors to exception and multilingual tools split between > iconv/multibyte (primarily) and dozens of other extensions, each with it's set > of traps and caveats to make writing functional multilingual application a > real pain.) There is <https://bugs.php.net/> to report such issues, and maybe php-internals is even better suited. Simply complaining about general deficiencies on php-general doesn't seem to be really helpful. -- Christoph M. Becker -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
