Re: Proposal for changes to the PHP license

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: musicdenotation@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Proposal for changes to the PHP license
From: Sebastian Krebs <krebs.seb@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 00:01:14 +0100
Cc: "php-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <php-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <E0DBBC68-F1BD-4E99-81F5-A22E4C1B2B89@gmail.com>

2014-01-26 <musicdenotation@xxxxxxxxx>

> With clause 6, PHP is not so "free software". This is forced advertisement.


Actually I don't care, but (maybe it's just me) why does "free software"
and advertisment exclude each other?


-- 
github.com/KingCrunch

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal for changes to the PHP license
  - From: musicdenotation

References:
- Proposal for changes to the PHP license
  - From: musicdenotation

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal for changes to the PHP license
Next by Date: Re: Proposal for changes to the PHP license
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal for changes to the PHP license
Next by thread: Re: Proposal for changes to the PHP license
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [PHP Home] [Apache Users] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Install] [PHP Classes] [Pear] [Postgresql] [Postgresql PHP] [PHP on Windows] [PHP Database Programming] [PHP SOAP]

Powered by Linux