Here is the benchmark details, you can find the benchmark code below: https://github.com/c9s/router-benchmark on intel xeon 16 cores machine: symfony/routing only got 4873.17 #/sec while phux got 16777.12 #/sec on intel core i5 machine: symfony/routing only got around 200-300 #/sec while phux got around 1600-1800 #/sec Also the pure php dispatch benchmark: cat dispatch.txt n=10000 Runing symfony/routing - . 6664.4093423989/s Runing phux extension - . 16501.898328291/s Rate Mem phux extension symfony/routing phux extension 16K/s 5M -- -40% symfony/routing 6K/s 786K 247% -- ================================== Bar Chart ================================== phux extension 16K/s | ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ | symfony/routing 6K/s | ████████████████████████ | ============================== System Information ============================== PHP Version: 5.5.6 CPU Brand String: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400S CPU @ 2.50GHz On 2014/1/6, at 下午12:36, Yo-An lin <cornelius.howl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yeah I know, the benchmark is pretty rough. Because its a two day work. :p > > The details will come up later. > > [Sent from iPhone] > > Sebastian Krebs <krebs.seb@xxxxxxxxx> 於 2014/1/6 7:54 寫道： > >> >> >> >> 2014/1/5 Lin Yo-An <cornelius.howl@xxxxxxxxx> >> Hi folks, >> >> >> Glad to announce that the first version of Phux PHP Router is released. >> >> https://github.com/c9s/phux >> >> >> Phux is basically a rewrite of PHP Roller router. >> >> Phux provides full functional C extension and pure PHP library with the >> same interface, so the extension is optional to install. >> >> but if you install phux extension, you may enjoy the performance of routing. >> >> >> >> Route Dispatch Benchmark (Symfony/Routing and Phux pure PHP) >> >> https://raw.github.com/c9s/Phux/master/benchmarks/reqs.png >> >> Hi, >> >> Not a comment about Phux directly, but I think I have to point this out (sadly: once more): When you use Apache Benchmark to benchmark the performance of an PHP-component, you in fact benchmark your system... [1] Another flaw is, that the whole benchmark setup is missing, which makes it slightly suspicious and unreliable. Two things, that spontanous came into my mind >> >> - Because you use ab to benchmark it is unlikely, that the S2-setup contains the routing-component only. This means, that in this benchmark you measure more than just the routing. OK, the README states, that "Testing with route dispatch only. (no controller)", but information on how do the benchmarks setup the routing is missing. >> - Like so many other benchmarks improvments, that every S2-application relies in production on, are probably missing. Do you compile the routing-table from a config into PHP? Do you use APC? While it sounds totally fair to compare two bare setups, it isn't. It probably ignores customizations, that are possible in one, but not the other and that affects the outcome. Most obvious example is what I mentioned: Parsing a YAML, generating the routing table and routing is something very different than reading the routing-table from an APC-cached PHP-file and routing. >> >> I don't say Phux is bad or something, but my advice is to rework the benchmark and publish the setup. Beside this I am more interested in benchmarks of the C-extension (especially against the native-PHP solution) :) >> >> Regards, >> Sebastian >> >> >> [1] The worst thing about this, is that you not only benchmark the target system, but the benchmark also relies heavily on the local one. Even worse than worse: Running both on the same machine let them affect each other in a non-predictable way. You get numbers, but you can never tell, what they mean. >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Yo-An Lin >> >> >> >> -- >> github.com/KingCrunch
