On 02 Oct 2012 at 12:07, Maciek Sokolewicz <maciek.sokolewicz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02-10-2012 11:59, Bálint Horváth wrote: >> The problem was already solved. I forgot to send a copy to the list... >> >> Rodrigo, break!? Ohh man, it's a crazy idea... A developer DOES NOT use >> break at all (in a loop)... (switch is an exception) > > I personally find this statement to be utter bullshit. There is nothing > wrong with using break. There is a very good reason why it's available > in the language. In very many cases, it costs a lot less code to add a > break than to add additional clauses to your while-conditional. Agree 100%. -- Cheers -- Tim