On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Karl DeSaulniers <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > @Stuart, > Actually that is what made me look into the PHP_EOL Stuart. Wanting to do > things right. > Did you not read my initial email? I am not suggesting anyone adopt my > code. > The question was directed to what the differences are so I COULD learn the > right way. > Being that this was something I got off a tutorial from an accredited > website, your saying that to the wrong person. > I went and read the manuals and am here now posting the question so as to > get the right direction. > I have heard the argument and actually agreed. It would be better to use > the PHP_EOL instead. > I have been directed in the right direction. So I will be changing my code > to reflect. > I meant no offence, I was simply responding to your comment: "Also, It has worked for years with no problem and I would still use it" ...and took it to mean you would have no issue with using that code, so I thought it worth pointing out that the standards exist for a reason. In the name of clarification, the "manual" I was referring to is the sum total of the RFCs that define the various protocols used on the internet, not the PHP manual which I believe you think I meant. -Stuart -- Stuart Dallas 3ft9 Ltd http://3ft9.com/
