On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:10 PM, larry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <larry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi folks. > > I have a project coming up where I will need to process a bazillion (OK, a > few million) records, possibly with multiple steps. (In this case I'm > reading data from one data archive into an Apache Solr server.) This is a > natural use case for a queue server, I believe, and while the requirements > of the project do not dictate a language it makes sense to me to use PHP for > the processing code since 1) Other parts of the project will be using it for > web-facing logic and 2) It's the language I know best. > > I'm trying to select a queue server to use. The two I'm investigating in > particular are Beanstalkd (http://kr.github.com/beanstalkd/) and Gearman > (http://gearman.org/). In this case I do need a reliable queue, even if > that means a record gets processed multiple times by accident (which in this > use case is fine). > > Has anyone worked with either of these systems? Any war stories to share, > good or bad? Any guidelines on the number of resources we need? I did a presentation at the PHP London meetup in May - my slides with some good Beanstalk points are at: http://abulman.co.uk/2010/05/queues-and-beanstalkd/ Gearman does have the advantage of being pretty much drop-in and work, calling remote PHP functions (or other languages that are setup as workers). With beanstalkd, there is no solid framework in place yet (though there are a couple of things around, I've seen one for CakePHP, and something for Drupal I think). That said, it's not hard to write one, depending on your personal choice of development framework, or not. Both have solid C-based daemons backing them up (which are so much easier to run than the original Perl daemon). I see Beanstalk as more flexible though, the Priorities, TTR limits, tubes and optional delays make for a powerful set of tools within the queue itself. Alister -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
