On 11 July 2010 23:19, Daniel Kolbo <kolb0057@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello PHPers, > > I'm having some trouble understanding some PHP behaviour. The following > example script exhibits the behaviour which I cannot understand. > [code] > <?php > > class A > { > public static $a = 3; > > function __construct() > { > //self::$a = $this; //[i] > self::$a =& $this; //[ii] > } > } > > class B extends A > { > function __construct() > { > parent::__construct(); > } > } > > class C { > var $c; > > function __construct() > { > $this->c =& A::$a; > } > > } > > > $c = new C; > $b = new B; > $cee = new C; > > var_dump($c->c); // [i] prints object(B), but [ii] prints int 3 > var_dump($cee->c); // [i] prints object(B), and [ii] prints object(B) > > ?> > [/code] > > Why does $c->c print 'int 3' ? > > I'm nervous to use "self::$a = $this;" because I don't want to be > copying the whole object. However, isn't $this just a reference to the > object, so "self::$a = $this;" is just copying the reference and not the > actual object, right? > > Thanks in advance What do you think the value should be? A static property is bound to the class and not to an instance of the class. So, &A::$a is a reference to the static value. If you alter the value, it will be altered for a subclasses of A and for any other reference to it. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php