On Friday 07 May 2010 11:26:56 Robert Cummings wrote: > Jan G.B. wrote: > > 2010/5/6 David McGlone <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> On Wednesday 05 May 2010 16:19:35 Paul M Foster wrote: > >>> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:03:41PM -0400, David McGlone wrote: > >>>> On Wednesday 05 May 2010 12:51:00 Ashley Sheridan wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 12:55 -0400, David McGlone wrote: > >>>>>> I've checked and checked and re-checked and I can't figure out what > >>>>>> I've done wrong. I'm getting a parse error: > >>> > >>> <snip> > >>> > >>>> WOW!!!! I have spent at least 4 hours reading and re-reading it and it > >>>> took you 3 seconds. > >>>> > >>>> That was the problem. How, how, how could I have overlooked that so > >>>> many times???? > >>>> > >>>> Thank you Ashley, I should have asked you 3 hours ago. ;-) > >>> > >>> Yeah, David, the rest of us are really disappointed in you. I mean, > >>> it's not like that's ever happened to *us*. ;-} > >> > >> I've been studying PHP for at least 2 years straight now, after dabbling > >> in it for about a year 6 years ago. So even though I've had my nose to > >> the grind for a good 2 years now, I don't think I can call my mistake a > >> "rookie mistake". Thats what's frustrating to me. LOL > >> > >> -- > >> Blessings, > >> David M. > > > > I would take this as a hint to prefer intval() instead of casts. > > initval($foo) would have drawn a fatal error - can't be overseen. ;) > > Casts are an order of magnitude faster than function calls. Ok y'all lost me waaaaaaaay back there... LOL Is there some type of function I can write to catch up? -- Blessings, David M. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php