again; i have neither the expertise ready, nor the time nor the money atm, to implement it myself. i'm hoping the php-dev team will agree with me that scalability of php driven apps should be put on the agenda. threading and shared memory are only a part of that discussion.. i'm opening a new thread to discuss this wider issue. On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Daniel Egeberg <degeberg@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:27, Rene Veerman <rene7705@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Stuart Dallas >>> I find it curious and amusing that you think the lack of threading support means PHP is somehow living in the dark ages. But yeah, complaining that the FREE tool you've CHOSEN to use doesn't support the feature YOU want... yeah, that's the way to go. >>> >> >> a) i'm not the only 1 who wants that feature, or would appreciate it >> when it's made available. >> >> b) to me it's a matter of keeping php attuned with the market trends. >> this thread forces me to reconsider my choice of language, because i >> do code to maybe get as big as facebook one day. >> it really really helps to have my codebase in a simple language like >> php, and yet be able to build blackboxes in that language that do >> threading and use shared memory.. >> imo, it saves significant time (money) and headaches (risk) when >> growing from 1 server to thousands of servers. > > If you believe you have the chance of becoming as big as Facebook and > that you would save loads of money by having PHP support > multi-threading, what's preventing you from hiring people to add that > to PHP? You can complain all you want, but even with the most > compelling reasons in the world it will not be done if there is not > enough manpower to do it. > > I'm not even sure why you are complaining about this on the general > list. Why don't you write an RFC and send it to internals for > discussion? I'm sure someone would be happy to give you write access > to the rfc namespace on the wiki if you sign up for an account there. > > Seeing as it's apparently so crucial to the operation of your > business, I don't think it's unreasonable that you commit some > resources to it. I don't think anyone is *against* that PHP supports > multi-threading. I think people are against having multi-threading if > it will stall other development in the PHP core. It's not like you can > implement it just like that. There is just a limit on how much that > can be done with the resources that are available. > > -- > Daniel Egeberg > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
