On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Stuart Dallas <stuttle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 24 Mar 2010, at 10:34, Rene Veerman wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Tommy Pham <tommyhp2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Funny you should mention all that. Let's say that you're longer with >>> that company, either by direct employment or contract consultant. >>> You've implemented C because you need 'thread'. Now your replacement >>> comes in and has no clue about C even though your replacement is a PHP >>> guru. How much headache is maintenance gonna be? Scalability? >>> Portability? wow.... >>> >> Thanks for posting this before i had to. >> >> +1, +1, +1... > > You realise, of course, that the same argument applies to using advanced features of PHP, such as threading should it ever be supported. > > -Stuart > Thanks for supporting PHP thread. Thus, it would be a lot easier for any PHP guru to scale, make it portable, or integrate into other PHP apps without having to juggle C, Ruby, Python... and whatever else is out there... -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
