Re: I need a fresh look at storing variables in MySQL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 5:18 PM -0700 3/17/10, Tommy Pham wrote:
-snip-
  Below is how I'd do the db structure:

tbl_survey_questions:
questionId = int / uid << your call
languageId = int / uid / char << your call if you intend to I18n it ;)
question = varchar << length is your requirement
PK > questionId + languageId

tbl_participants:
userId = int / uid
userName = varchar
PK > userId

tbl_answers:
userId = int / uid
questionId = int / uid
languageId = int / uid
answer = varchar / mediumtext / or another type of text field
PK > userId + questionId + languageId

The reason why I'd structure it like this is:

Let's say you have question 1 with 5 (a-e) multiple choices, you
aggregrate your query (GROUP BY) to db for question 1 and see how many
responses are for a to e (each).  If your survey is I18n and your DB
reflects it, you can even analyze how/why certain cultural background
would choose each of those answer. (don't flame me... I know the
environment comes in to growing up too :p and that's way beyond the
scope of this list )


Tommy:

The way I handled this was that all responder aspects, such as cultural background, were all recorded before the responder started the survey. This was part an authorization process and the responders had to "earn" their way into the survey by providing personal data. If they did not, then they weren't allowed to enter the survey. Likewise, they had to turn javascript ON or they were not permitted to continue.

Please understand that in this survey, the purpose was that the client wasn't hoping for responders to fill out the survey (even though they would like them to), but rather providing a method for the membership to show their preferences in a union contract for their collective interest. As such, responders had a vested interest in participating. The survey would take between 20 to 60 minutes to complete and thus required a significant time investment.

Considering that each answer (or series) could be compared to any number of others, I thought it best to make each question/answer created an individual record -- the table was very simple:

survey_id
question_id
key1
key2
answer

1) The union wants several surveys like this, so I provided a survey_id.

2) The question_id was simply an identifier for the question -- a remote key to a question table.

3) Key1 and Key2 were simply values that were intended to tie the question/answer pairs together into a single event (i.e., a vote).

4) Answer -- what we are after.

This format lends itself well to analyses using MySQL.

Cheers,

tedd

--
-------
http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


[Index of Archives]     [PHP Home]     [Apache Users]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Install]     [PHP Classes]     [Pear]     [Postgresql]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP on Windows]     [PHP Database Programming]     [PHP SOAP]

  Powered by Linux