> > And I was pointing out that this would not be a valid test when there is > a caching DNS on the LAN. I also pointed out how to avoid caching issues - the comment was aimed at the author of the message before mine. > > Too much of the conversation and most of the attribution was stripped > too early for this to be coherent. Why the negativity? A question was asked and several possible solutions were provided based on that original question. All the "conversation" was relevant IMO.
