On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Dan McCullough <dan.mccullough@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > Like Israel it depends on the client I am doing several projects for a > client now that the hosting company is still using 4.0.6 - and its been a > headache. Most of the personal projects and many of my other clients are > on > 5.1 or higher. > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Tom Barrett <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > 2009/10/29 Israel Ekpo <israelekpo@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > I just want to conduct a quick survey to find out what version of PHP > > > people > > > are using in their production environments. > > > > > > I have a PHP extension for Solr that I have set the minimum required > > > version > > > as 5.2.11. > > > > > [snip] > > > > > I cannot go below 5.2.0 though but I am thinking about starting at > 5.2.4 > > > and > > > newer. > > > > > > I would really appreciate some feedback as it will be useful in helping > > me > > > determine which PHP version numbers to do my regression tests against. > > > > > > > > cat /etc/redhat-release > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.3 (Tikanga) > > > > > php -v > > PHP 5.1.6 (cli) (built: Feb 26 2009 07:01:12) > > Copyright (c) 1997-2006 The PHP Group > > Zend Engine v2.1.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2006 Zend Technologies > > > > > yum list php > > Loaded plugins: downloadonly, rhnplugin, security > > Excluding Packages in global exclude list > > Finished > > Installed Packages > > php.x86_64 > > 5.1.6-23.2.el5_3 > > installed > > > > I wouldn't have thought this to be too uncommon. > > > > HTH > > > The internal Zend Engine version my extension was written for is 2.2.0 or newer. That is why I would not be able to go below 5.2.0, unfortunately. But so far, I appreciate your responses. Please keep it coming. -- "Good Enough" is not good enough. To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift. Quality First. Measure Twice. Cut Once.
