On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:37 AM, kyle.smith<kyle.smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > Recently i read this blog post about speed issues comparing PHP with > ASP.net, please, read that and comment what you think about it: > http://misfitgeek.com/blog/aspnet/php-versus-asp-net-ndash-windows-versu > s-linux-ndash-who-rsquo-s-the-fastest/ > > The big deal is: I don't know if this bechmark is true or false but, > what are doing the PHP team about speed issues? Results like that maybe > results like this can tarnish the image of language. > > So, what do you think about it? > > > -- > > My main issue with the tests is this: > > ASP.NET (C#) is psuedo-byte-code compiled and cached prior to execution. > This is a huge boost to performance. The tests should be re-done with > something like IonCube compiled PHP. > > I think ASP.NET would still win, though. > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > The one big thing missed in the article is portability. While running ASP.NET under Mono on Linux is possible, its not likely to be as workable as taking php to almost any other environment. And really,if you want to learn c# then just go learn java and make it better. -- Bastien Cat, the other other white meat -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
