Why do you all always use isset?
Why do you don't use array_key_exists instead? is it a more semantic
solution?
<?php
$key = 'UserWishesDateRange'; # just to make statement shorter
if( array_key_exists($key, $_POST ) && 'T' == $_POST[$key] )
{
echo ' the key exists... and it is a "T" '';
}
*isset*: Determine if a variable is set and is not NULL*
array_key_exists: *Checks if the given key or index exists in the array
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:42 PM, John Butler
<govinda.webdnatalk@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>>> If you switch it around you'll get a notice because the IF evaluates
>> from left to right. So you just want to make sure you check isset()
>> first.
>>
>> This would throw a notice:
>>
>> if($_POST['UserWishesDateRange'] == 'T' &&
>> isset($_POST['UserWishesDateRange'])) {
>>
>
> Aha! That must be what I tried and was still getting the notice!
> Interesting that it works (without notice) if we check against the isset ()
> one first. It makes if() look more intelligent that I would think... as if
> it saying, "good now that we've established that the var isset, now is it
> also equal to '___'., as opposed to just, "is var set, and is var equal to
> "___'.
--
Martin Scotta
