Re: Back from the dead with a racing question!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jason Pruim<jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Bastien Koert wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:51 AM, tedd<tedd.sperling@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> At 11:12 AM -0400 7/17/09, Jason Pruim wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone!
>>>>
>>>> So some of you may have noticed that I have been away for quite
>>>> awhile...
>>>> Been trying to get settled (Moved across the country) and getting a job.
>>>>
>>>> And now that that is done I have a question about a project that I might
>>>> be doing for my current employer and want to do it properly.
>>>>
>>>> If all goes through, I'll be writing an online database that upwards of
>>>> 10
>>>> people will be using at various times through out the day. Basically, in
>>>> a
>>>> form they fill out a model number, customer name, phone number etc.
>>>> etc..
>>>> And then submit the form. After submitting they need to write the log
>>>> number
>>>> on some paperwork. If I have 2 people submit the form at the same time,
>>>> I'm
>>>> thinking I could end up with a race condition and they might get the
>>>> wrong
>>>> log number (The log number is simply a consecutive record number)
>>>>
>>>> Do I need to be reading up on locking tables/rows? Or in my situation as
>>>> I've briefly described it do I not have to worry about it? Or is there a
>>>> third door with the magic bullet that will solve all my problems? :)
>>>>
>>>> Any advice is greatly appreciated as always, RTFMing is good as well, as
>>>> long as M is defined :)
>>>>
>>>> I'm not afraid of google either, just need the right terms to hit it
>>>> with
>>>> so I don't go into "search overload" as the commercials for a rival
>>>> search
>>>> engine claim :)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Everyone!
>>>
>>> Jason:
>>>
>>> Welcome back.
>>>
>>> Clearly if you have two or more people checkout the same record at the
>>> same
>>> time and each edits the record then you ARE going to have problems when
>>> each
>>> updates the record.
>>>
>>> You can solve this problem by using transactions -- here's a link:
>>>
>>> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/lock-tables-and-transactions.html
>>>
>>> When someone is editing a record, you also need to be able to show the
>>> next
>>> person(s) that the record they want is currently busy and not available.
>>> However, I'm not sure as to how to notify the next user that the table is
>>> locked via php. Perhaps a table status might provide that information. If
>>> so, then use that to notify the next user.
>>>
>>> As for your log of activity, just create a another record (with an
>>> auto_increment index) in your activity log table and update that record
>>> with
>>> the data you need to record, such as user id, timestamp, what record they
>>> accessed and whatever else you want after the transaction is completed.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> tedd
>>>
>>> --
>>> -------
>>> http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>>
>>>
>>
>> As a further note to tedd's reply on transactions, you will need to
>> use the INNODB engine in mysql should you want to use transactions.
>> Transactions here are done a row locking level not table so you should
>> have fewer issues.
>
> I also just found out that unless I can convince them to host it off site,
> it'll be on a windows machine....  So php & mssql... Does that change alot?
>
> To answer some of the other questions the Log number is currently just an
> auto incrementing consuctive number. So an auto+increment would work
> perfectly. What I'm trying to avoid is:
>
> User1
> User2
>
> User1 submits to log number 12345
> User2 submits to log number 12346
>
> User1 is told their log number is 12346
> User2 is told their log number is 12346
>
> But User1 & User2 are on different computers... And if it's as easy as using
> the equivelant for: SELECT * FROM table WHERE UserID="User1" ORDER BY
> lognumber desc LIMIT 1; Then I'm good... I know how to proceed with writing
> it... Just need to figure out how to bill/sell it! ;)
>
>
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

MSSQL doesn't allow limit, but you can do a

select top 1 * from table [where] [order by lognumber desc]

-- 

Bastien

Cat, the other other white meat

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[Index of Archives]     [PHP Home]     [Apache Users]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Install]     [PHP Classes]     [Pear]     [Postgresql]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP on Windows]     [PHP Database Programming]     [PHP SOAP]

  Powered by Linux