2009/5/21 Jim Lucas <lists@xxxxxxxxx> > Jim Lucas wrote: > >> Since this has been a topic of dicussion, I figured I would add my >> thoughts. >> >> I have been toying with the idea of doing a <table>-less layouts involving >> tabular data, calendars, etc... >> >> Recent threads have finally made me do it. Let me know what you think. >> >> http://www.cmsws.com/examples/templates/div_tables.php >> http://www.cmsws.com/examples/templates/div_tables.phps (source for >> above) >> http://www.cmsws.com/examples/templates/div_cal.php >> >> When you turn off the styles, the calendar becomes pretty rough on the >> eyes, but still "accessible". >> >> Same thing with the tabular data structure. >> >> But, not knowing how the various types of accessibility applications work, >> I am guessing that the layout to an application trying to read it should >> work fairly well. Let me know if I am way off the mark with my thoughts. >> >> If you want to respond off list, that if fine by me. >> >> TIA >> >> > I forgot to mention that I have checked this in the following browsers all > on Windows XP SP3 > IE6 > Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.20 > Mozilla Firefox 3.0.10 > Safari 4 Public Beta > Opera 9.64 > > the layout looked exactly the same between all the various browsers. > > If you have a different browser then mentioned above and you have a > different layout let me know. If you could get me a screen shot, that would > be great. > > Thank again. > > > -- > Jim Lucas > > "Some men are born to greatness, some achieve greatness, > and some have greatness thrust upon them." > > Twelfth Night, Act II, Scene V > by William Shakespeare > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > But you're just using the same design semantic, but coding it in CSS instead of using <table>; it even has the same name! There appears to be nothing wrong with tables when used for the right reasons - they _are_ there for a reason. -- Luke Slater http://dinosaur-os.com/ :O)
