On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 13:30 -0500, haliphax wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:53 AM, bruce <bedouglas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > and haliphax... > > > > i specifically sent the reply to only you.. you then felt the need to reply > > to the list as a whole.... > > > > hmm.. ok.. this thread is officially dead!! > > > > unless of course it gets back to the initial question... > > > > peace!! > > > > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: haliphax [mailto:haliphax@xxxxxxxxx] > >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:38 AM > >> > To: php-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > Subject: Re: Workflow app for software > > --8<-- > > >> Again, please do not top-post. It is the agreed-upon procedure in this > >> list to bottom-post when replying to threads. (I am not just going > >> "renegade thread-Nazi" on you.) > > > > Could you show me the signed agreement list. While it's convention on > > this list, it's certainly not something everyone agreed upon. > > To Rob, > I meant agreed-upon as in: it's been written... so somebody had to > agree to it up to the point that it was posted here - > http://us3.php.net/reST/php-src/README.MAILINGLIST_RULES "It has been written" and "it has been agreed upon" are two completely different things. Many things have been written, few things are agreed upon. Cheers, Rob. -- http://www.interjinn.com Application and Templating Framework for PHP -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php