On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 22:27 -0700, mike wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Robert Cummings <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I thought we covered a question just like this a week ago... yes this > > will not pose a problem for a bytecode cache. > > Apologies. I saw an example of some OOP thing from internals before it > moved to -general. > > So even using call_user_func() with dynamic functions won't break the > usefulness of APC? The only thing that should defeat the usefulness of a bytecode cache is the use of eval since the cache has no reference point upon which to determine if the eval'd code has been previously compiled and has changed since. Cheers, Rob. -- http://www.interjinn.com Application and Templating Framework for PHP -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
