On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Robert Cummings <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 23:02 -0400, Andrew Ballard wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Robert Cummings <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 08:44 -0700, Yeti wrote:
>> > > I would understand it if it was like this ..
>> > >
>> > > <?php
>> > > $search = isset($_GET['search']) ? $_GET['search'] : '';
>> > > # versus
>> > > if (isset($_GET['search'])) { $search = $_GET['search']; }
>> > > ?>
>> > >
>> > > In the first statement $search would either be set to $_GET['search']
>> > > or an empty string, whereas in the second statement $search would only
>> > > be set, if there is a $_GET['search']
>> >
>> > Wrong. They are equivalent. The second is probably just easier to follow
>> > with a clearly defined default value outside the conditional block.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Rob.
>>
>> No, they are not. In the first statement, $search is the value of
>> $_GET['search'] if the key exists, or an empty string if it does not.
>> In the second statement, $search is the value of $_GET['search'] if
>> the key exists or retains its original value if the key does not
>> exist.
>
> Yes, I didn't realize Yeti had changed the OP's code which convoluted
> the issue since his version wasn't what I was responding to and I didn't
> realize he dropped a line from the OP's code.
>
> Cheers,
> Rob.
Yup. :-) Those are the ones that get you. Especially when it happens
in actual code and not just a mailing list post.
Andrew
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
