On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Ashley Sheridan
<ash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Unless it's a JPEG 2000 (which isn't web-safe) then it's lossy, even at
> 100% quality. The nature of the algorithm is such that there is always
> loss involved, which is why it's best to work on photos that are not in
> JPEG format, as each save and re-open creates more and more distortion
> (although not much that will be noticed in a photo!)
Hey, you kids get this off-topic discussion off my lawn!
How many times do I have to remind you that this is a *PHP* list?
Don't I do well enough leading by example by never posting non-PHP
stuff to this list?
Good God....
--
</Daniel P. Brown>
More full-root dedicated server packages:
Intel 2.4GHz/60GB/512MB/2TB $49.99/mo.
Intel 3.06GHz/80GB/1GB/2TB $59.99/mo.
Intel 2.4GHz/320/GB/1GB/3TB $74.99/mo.
Dedicated servers, VPS, and hosting from $2.50/mo.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
