On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 22:26 -0700, Jim Lucas wrote: > Chris wrote: > >> Don't forget that in PHP5, the constructor named has changed. In PHP4 > >> it called a method with the same name as the class. But, in PHP5, it > >> looks for __construct() instead. > > > > If __construct doesn't exist then it falls back to the php4 way - makes > > it backwards compatible :) > > > > But, if people want to code to php5 standards and beyond, then I would > recommend always using the __construct() method to construct your class. > Then make it work in php4. Not the other way around. It's unfortunate that PHP5 decided to throw a Strict Standards exception when you include both style constructors. For instance, I'm certain at one point the following was recommended: <?php class Foo { function __construct() { } function Foo() { self::__construct(); } } ?> This was perfectly compatible with PHP5 and gave precedence to the PHP5 constructor style. Somewhere along the line though PHP5 started spouting: Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor So I just completely removed the PHP5 style constructors from my code and use the PHP4 style since then there are no exceptions. Mark my words though... at some point PHP will start spewing an E_DEPRECATED for PHP4 style constructor *lol*. Cheers, Rob. -- http://www.interjinn.com Application and Templating Framework for PHP -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php