On Wednesday 02 July 2008 04:39:57 Bastien Koert wrote: > On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Stefano Esposito <ragnarok@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:59:20 +0200 > > > > Børge Holen <borge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 01 July 2008 13:34:28 Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote: > > > > Umm have you ever thought about watermark-ing it? (In case its not > > > > a part of your website or something..) > > > > > > heh, this dude got way to much time on his hands... ;D > > > > This dude has commitments, and watermark is not an option. > > > > > > -- > > Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f > > > > Sponsor: > > Vasco è tornato! Sul tuo cellulare Il mondo che vorrei > > Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?midw49&d1-7 > > > > -- > > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > since the image is sent to the client browser, anyone with enough brains to > look in the cache will be able to access the image. What about setting the > image to show only inside a flash viewer with ming? I hope flash dies out in a silent bang. However, why he is going throught every nonsecure option trying to keep some images safe instead of either don't put them out at all or using flash as the easy way out is beyond me -- --- Børge Holen http://www.arivene.net -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
