On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:05 PM, M. Sokolewicz <tularis@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Nathan Nobbe wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Colin Guthrie <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> Pavel wrote: >>> >>> В сообщении от Thursday 12 June 2008 16:43:59 Richard Heyes написал(а): >>>> >>>> This may be of interest (HTML 5 diffences to HTML 4 overview): >>>>> >>>>> what about xHTML? html died few years ago and i thought is was >>>> official.. >>>> >>>> Oh there are *lots* of discussions about that. Personally I'm sticking >>> with >>> XHTML. >>> >> >> >> i imagine at some point we will see a revision of xhtml that incorporates >> the changes from html4 -> 5. something like xhtml 1.1 or 2.0. at version >> 1.0, its still just a pup }:D >> >> -nathan >> > > uuuhhmmm.... 1.0? The thing is already at 1.1 and 2.0 is in the make... > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2 is the latest (xhtml 2.0) draft. > XHTML™ 2.0 W3C Working Draft 26 July 2006, not that new anymore after 2 > years, most browsers even have good support for it these days. i suppose i put too much faith in the right hand nav on the w3cschools site =/ http://www.w3schools.com/ -nathan
