On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 12:43 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Tony Marston <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > "Robert Cummings" <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message > > > While I agree that Interfaces are mostly a lot of extra code, I have to > > > also say that they are there primarily to enforce a contract between the > > > user of the interface and their classes that claim to implement the > > > interface. If someone creates a class that "Implements" an interface, > > > then when I have to go edit or use the class, it had better damn well > > > implement what it says it does :) > > > > "enforcing a contract" is a lot of maningless gobbledegook. The simple > > fact > > is that it is possible to have an interface without ever using the term > > "interface". Nothing extra is added by using the term "interface" (except > > for effort) so there is absolutely no advantage in doing so. That is why I > > say that the term "interface" is a waste of effort as absolutely nothng is > > gained. > > > can u say dejavu ?? > > lets c if we can get another 100 post thread going like we did last year :D > this is turning into a dup. I've been on this list long enough to know that 99% of what comes across is a dupe :) Cheers, Rob. -- http://www.interjinn.com Application and Templating Framework for PHP -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
