On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Jim Lucas <lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Daniel Brown wrote:
> >
> > I like Eric's method better than the timestamp method I proposed.
> > Much cleaner and easier to institute, and I'd hazard a guess at it
> > being more reliable as well.
> >
>
> The initial problem that I see with it would be that if the user clicks the
> submit button a second time, the first transaction is canceled. If the process
> takes a long time, maybe the time period for the server to get the approval has
> already passed, but the server is still doing stuff but not redirected the
> person to the success page. At this point, the user has purchased the item
> successfully, but they did see the success page. So they repeat the process,
> over and over and over...
Right, but I meant that as a replacement to my "backup" solution.
As a backup for disabling the button using JavaScript, as mentioned.
Sorry, should've clarified that. Good catch, Jim.
--
</Daniel P. Brown>
Forensic Services, Senior Unix Engineer
1+ (570-) 362-0283
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
