At 11:30 AM -0500 3/6/08, Andrés Robinet wrote:
Still, I kept the other part of the signature
(which you can see at the bottom) because it
contains information that can be of some value
for anybody reading my posts. It says who I am,
who I work with, where we are and the many to
contact us.
It's not about bandwidth, it's just about
removing "noise". Many times I even remove the
whole footer so the messages are more readable.
If it was only my decision, I wouldn't have a
footer at all.
Regards,
Rob(inet)
Andrés Robinet | Lead Developer | BESTPLACE CORPORATION
5100 Bayview Drive 206, Royal Lauderdale
Landings, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308 | TEL
954-607-4207 | FAX 954-337-2695 |
Email: info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | MSN Chat:
best@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | SKYPE: bestplace | Web:
bestplace.biz | Web: seo-diy.com
Personally, I don't see much wrong/right about
signatures provided they are short -- your's is
fine.
If one has a disclaimer of some sort, then
provide a link -- that way IF anyone is
interested, they can follow the link and read.
But, outside of a link, I don't think any of us
need to see the disclaimer repeated with every
post.
As it is now, not trimming post to what is
relevant plagues this list -- we don't need
billboards of nonsense to adding to the noise.
Enough said.
Cheers,
tedd
--
-------
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php