On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 13:09 -0500, tedd wrote: > At 9:50 AM -0600 2/22/08, Greg Donald wrote: > >On 2/21/08, Nick Stinemates <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >-snip- for no importance > > > >I am indeed waiting, where's your code? When, and under what > >circumstances exactly, is getting back an array of objects from a > >function or method call "poor design" ? Please, do tell. > > > This reminds me of when we first started adding 0's to our code. > Before then, we just used 1's and surprisingly there were purist who > claimed that using both was just poor design. > > We 10's (as we used to call ourselves) went on to digital stuff while > the purist continued to build pyramids. Oddly enough, I don't see > them around much anymore. I for 1 think you're full of it :) Cheers, Rob. -- .------------------------------------------------------------. | InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com | :------------------------------------------------------------: | An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting | | a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services | | such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn | | also provides an extremely flexible architecture for | | creating re-usable components quickly and easily. | `------------------------------------------------------------' -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
