On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 16:36 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote: > tedd wrote: > > At 11:59 PM -0500 12/12/07, Robert Cummings wrote: > >> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:21 -0500, tedd wrote: > >> > >> > Yeah, but we haven't proven order yet either. :-) > >> > >> Order exists all around us. > > > > Maybe around you, but I have a wife, two daughters, and four female > > grandchildren. > > that would suggest you live in a world devoid of reason ... which is not > the same as order :-P but it's reasonable to assume that it's a fairly chaotic place :-) You guys are so good at dragging me back in... reasons requires order. You can't reason without order. Unless of course you're completely unreasonable. But then, is it random? Who cares about the question of order, that should be another thread. This thread is about random. Of course, the whole though that one thread could have anything to do with something in particular is predicated on the existence of order, so maybe this thread doesn't really exist and no others do either ;) > while we're on the subject of order, I'll have a no. 12, a no. 45 and 2 no.97's please > > omg this is so off topic it's liable to come full circle - actually circles seem pretty > damned orderly ... which just leaves the question as to whether circles exist or that > we merely projection them onto reality, which is great because that question cannot > be objectively answered unless your the "one true god"(tm) - who probably doesn't give a hoot > anyway. The spaghetti monster guy? :D Cheers, Rob. -- ........................................................... SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com Leveraging the buying power of the masses! ........................................................... -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php