On Nov 11, 2007 11:52 PM, Chris <dmagick@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As I said, it's a micro-optimization *shrug*. 0.0004 seconds difference > over 10 iterations - wow ;) > actually it was just one iteration; the output isnt very clear, but thats the value of a variable. anyway, i was surprised to see the function was faster at all. i though the include would be faster. so not only is the function faster (if only but a bit) its also cleaner as well. i think a decision between the 2 approaches no-brainer. -nathan
