Stut wrote: >> I don't like the branching in subversion, it's a lot easier to work with >> in CVS. > > That's odd since this is one of the major advantages that Subversion has > over CVS (for me at any rate). When you branch or tag in CVS it will sit > there and create a copy of every single file in the repository. > Depending on the size of your projects this can take a while. Can't agree more with you Stut! I've used CVS and Subversion quite a lot for a number of years. All my live sites are just svn checkouts these days - makes deployment very simple. The branching in Subversion is a gazillion times better than CVS if you take a bit of time really reading the SVN Book (linked earlier). I sat down and read it properly and have a pretty good understanding of the branching and merging procedure and find it very intuitive now. CVS's branching was always a bit of a dark art to me! > Personally I used to use CVS until I discovered Subversion, and I've > never looked back. However, I am now looking forward and have recently > started playing with Git. Git is something of a paradigm shift when > compared to "traditional" source control, but the way it works is > starting to make a lot of sense to me. I suggest you include it in your > evaluations before deciding on a source control system. Yeah I need to learn Git too for various projects I work on (Xorg and compiz/beryl stuff mainly), but it's maybe not the best utility for website development. With Git, you keep a full copy (or clone) of the RCS on your local machine (this means all the changes you ever made!). This can take up a lot of space for web work with e.g. large graphic files all over the place (although there are ways to compress down/flatten a git repo). With Subversion, you'll pretty much need double the space as it keeps a "clean" copy of all files in addition to the ones you can work on. With SVN you can do a modicum of offline work - make changes revert to clean copy, see your changes to the repository (svn diff). With CVS you have to be online to do this. With wrappers to SVN like SVK you can also get some of the Git benefits (and drawbacks) with SVN. One other good thing about Subversion is the flexibility of it's hooks. You can setup scripts to automatically deploy your changes to a live environment. It's ace! If you are using an interal Wiki, Ticket system I can thoroughly recommend Trac for this. It has excellent integration with Subversion. Hope that helps. Col -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php