On Friday 02 March 2007 14:48, tedd wrote: > At 5:24 PM -0600 3/1/07, Richard Lynch wrote: > >On Wed, February 28, 2007 6:41 pm, Robert Cummings wrote: > >> What about when you need to share those files across a 50 node > >> network? > >> I'd keep it in a database, then when I need it cache a local copy on > >> the > >> filesystem. Then I can just check the timestamp in the database to see > >> if the file has changed. Voila, multi-node high availability images. > >> > >> Seems better than have a local copy of every single image. I guess the > >> answer is... it depends on what you're doing! > > > >Add an image server (or 20) and change the HTML to point to the image > >server. > > > >Use rsync on the 20 image client servers from the master image server. > > > >Lots of ways to skin this cat. > > But the cat ain't going to like any of them. I don't particulary like cats... > > tedd > -- > ------- > http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com -- --- Børge Kennel Arivene http://www.arivene.net --- -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
