Richard Lynch wrote: > You mean Refresh is a real header? Yeah, although if I remember correctly, the W3C really dislikes people using it for redirection instead of just refreshing the current URL. If that's the case, however, why can we indicate the URL at all? :-) A few years ago, someone conducted some pretty extensive research into browser support for Refresh. I can't seem to find the URL, but the results demonstrated extremely widespread support. (I can't imagine support for a real HTTP header being poorer than support for the same header expressed as http-equiv.) Anyway, it's as real as Content-Disposition. :-) Chris -- Chris Shiflett http://shiflett.org/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
