# robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx / 2006-12-16 09:52:18 -0500: > On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 15:59 +0000, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > # robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx / 2006-12-16 07:24:49 -0500: > > > On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 19:58 +0800, Kai Xiang wrote: > > > > On 12/16/06, Richard Lynch <ceo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > (*) > > > > > Actually, if somebody wants to embed the ZE inside of something other > > > > > than PHP, then I think Zend expects to get paid for that. > > > > > > I don't think so... the PHP and Zend licenses are quite liberal with > > > very few restrictions. Namely that you don't call your software php or > > > use php in the name (something many packages seem to ignore (either that > > > or they got permission)). The Zend license is practically a clone of the > > > PHP license with a search and replace for PHP to Zend :) There's nothing > > > that says you have to pay to embed it in your own software. That said, > > > if you make a product that uses either the PHP or Zend engine and makes > > > oodles of money, I think you should feel somewhat morally obliged to > > > give back in some way. > > > > Sorry if I take this OT, but when I publish my work under the MIT license, > > I mean it. Anything else would be hypocrisy. OSS is not beggarware. > > I'm not sure I understand the point you are making :/ That the license states everything he needs to feel obliged to. -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
