RE: google video like site

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



siavish...

to write a site that handles a few 100 hits/day and has functionality to
upload/download/view videos isn't that hard to do. (not including the
look/feel, and not including the testing aspect) just throwing a site
together isn't that hard.

however, if you really want to have a robust/scalable/secure app, capable of
handling serious traffic, as well as all the monitoring functionality you
want to admin/run the site, and to move/track your data/videos.. .then it's
not a simple upload of an app/modify the app for a few weeks..

there is a skill to well designed/implemented sites that stand up to
traffic.

peace


-----Original Message-----
From: siavash1979@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:siavash1979@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 11:49 AM
To: php-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  google video like site


Quoting Robert Cummings <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 09:30 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
> > Robert Cummings wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 23:40 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
> > > > I doubt they were stupid enough to shell out that kind of cash to on
a
> php-nuke install,
> > >
> > > Why not? It's not the code they want, it's the traffic. You can have
the
> > > best code in the world and if 0 people visit it, it's pretty worthless
> > > to anyone but you.
> >
> > you are right - I was implicitly thinking along the lines that there is
no
> > way in hell a php-nuke install could stand up to amount of
> requests/processing
> > youtube must cope with.
>
> Definitely not on one computer, but if you offload to say 30 servers,
> you can probably process 100 million hits per day. Servers are probably
> cheap compared to their bandwidth costs.
>
> > there is a good reason that properties like Yahoo (which uses php of
> course) stick all
> > the heavy lifting code in php extensions written in C.
>
> True, but nothing stopping a site like youtube from taking a shoddy app
> and moving some of the heavy lifting into extensions themselves.
>
> > then there is the issue of differentiation - would *you* settle for some
> generic POS
> > piece of software if you had billions of dollar to invest in build a
> custom, killer app?
>
> Probably not, but I know that millions of people everyday settle for
> Microsoft ;) Some of these people probably have a few spare billion
> dollars... not me though :|
>
> > okay, sure, everything in software land is eventually comoditized and
> available as
> > open source eventually, but right now there are no google-video type
> applications out
> > there that can handle the amount of traffic the mentioned sites handle.
>
> Id on't think the code is the bottleneck, I think the bottle neck is the
> 200 to  400 terabytes of data youtube transfers everyday.
>
> > there is also the premise that youtube wouldn't be youtube if it were
> running on php-nuke,
> > for the simple fact it would have been hacked to death. no?
>
> Well, that's definitely a valid point, no argument from me there heheh.
>
> Cheers,
> Rob.
> --
> .------------------------------------------------------------.
> | InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
> :------------------------------------------------------------:
> | An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting  |
> | a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services  |
> | such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
> | also provides an extremely flexible architecture for       |
> | creating re-usable components quickly and easily.          |
> `------------------------------------------------------------'
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>


Thanks everyone. By the way I wasn't implying that any of these sites are
being
run on php-nuke, I was wondering if they're however running on something
similar
to php-nuke.

Just because you tube, google video, break.com and a few other sites all
basically look the same and function the same way, so I thought they might
be
using the same backend code. I'm making a small site for a community that
wants
the same idea, I was wondering if it's as easy as installing a software, or
that
I have to write it all from scratch.

Thanks again for all your responses.

Siavash

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


[Index of Archives]     [PHP Home]     [Apache Users]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Install]     [PHP Classes]     [Pear]     [Postgresql]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP on Windows]     [PHP Database Programming]     [PHP SOAP]

  Powered by Linux