# jay.bauer@xxxxxx / 2006-10-11 16:42:06 -0400: > And actually, Kiran in our lab proposed that as a very easy fix to > implement, and we've tested it and it works fine. In other words we > make 50 persistent connections, with the timeout at 10 seconds, wait a > minute and then make another round of the same php requests. With the > fix we proposed all new php connections are made. So we know this > works. I think if this was implemented and the documentation was clear > that what the persistent timeout provided was for these connections to > be shutdown when every a new connection tried to use them, PHP or not, > that would go along way to satisfying most customers. Especially if it > clearly and cleanly documented that was how it worked. That's not so much a fix as a different behavior. FWIW the current one is perfectly sensible in other circumstances. Is there a way to query the age of the connection? -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php