Antonio Bassinger wrote: > Hi gang, > > Situation: > > I've a HTTP server. I intend to run a file upload service. There could > be up > to 10000 subscribers. Each saving files up to 10 MB. > > I made a proof-of-concept service using PHP & MySQL, where there is a > single > database, but many tables - a unique table for each subscriber. But I why do you have a unique table for each user? > realize that I may land in trouble with such a huge database. Would it be there is an upper limit on the number of tables dependent on your system; you don't want the kind of trouble that hitting that limit will bring. > better to have a separate database for each subscriber? NO - I really don't think that is an option either - 10000+ databases doesn't sound any better than 10000+ tables. 1 database, 2 tables: USERS: user_id user_name ...etc FILES: file_id user_id file_location ...etc > > Which approach is better, many tables in 1 database, or many databases with > 1 or max 2 tables? > > Kindly suggest with pros and cons of each. I can't think of a 'pro' for either of your approaches. > > Thanks & Regards, > Bassinger > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
