I'm taking a wild guess here, maybe the browser insists on waiting for some content but it's maximum content wait time is 5 seconds, the browser could detect the connection to the server is still open and wait for 5 seconds or another time On 12/22/05, Ron Rudman <ron@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I've got this down to a bare bones test but am still stumped. Can anyone > explain why I get the behavior I do? > > I have a frameset with 3 frames: > <html> > <head><title>testing</title></head> > <frameset rows='100,100,*'> > <frame src='test1.php'></frame> > <frame src='test2.php'></frame> > <frame src='test3.php'></frame> > </frameset> > </html> > > test1.php and test2.php are both simply: <? sleep(5); ?> > test3.php is simply: <? echo "This is some content"; ?> > > When I invoke the main frameset, the output from test3.php takes 5 seconds > to appear. > If I comment out either one of the sleep calls, the output from test3.phpis > immediate, which is what I expected in the first place. > > I have session.auto_start = 0 in php.ini, so this has nothing to do with > sessions. > I am running php 5.0.5. > I get the same results with both apache 2/mod_php and lighttpd/fastcgi, > the > latter with 40 php processes running. > > I thought that each frame in a page was executed independently and > asynchronously, yet frame4.php insists on "waiting" for one of the other > frames to complete (if the sleeps are 5 and 10, frame3 produces its > output > after 5 seconds). > > What am I missing here? > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Hi Everyone, I am running PHP 5 on Windosws XP SP2 with MySQL5, Bye Now!
