"Robert Cummings" <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1132257406.18353.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 14:34, Dan Baker wrote: >> <afan@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:437B5A85.9010901@xxxxxxxxxxx >> > Hi to all, >> > always wondered what's better way to mix html and php code. Here are >> > three >> > "ways" of the same code. Which one you prefer? (And why, of caurse :)) >> (snip) >> > I think third solution would be the best solution? >> >> IF you are doing a complex site, then the third option is almost >> mandatory. >> You typically do not know what code will be in the header, until you have >> processed some of the page. Building the page as-you-go, allows for easy >> alteration of previously built HTML code. Complex sites are extremely >> difficult to create using the "template" approach, because of the variety >> of >> output. > > Ummm... bullturds :) > (snip) > > Now anywhere in the modules (which incidentally get loaded before the > content), or anywhere else in a sub-template content can be accumulated > in any of the above accumulator names. I have worked on plenty of > complex sites, and my JavaScript and other content always goes EXACTLY > where it's supposed to be, regardless of where the logic exists that > determines it's need to exist. For instance to include on load > javascript from any module: Looks very good. I rescind my previous post. I haven't worked with templates of this magnitude before. DanB -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
