On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 14:47, Rory Browne wrote: > (int) seems to be faster, but not by an awful lot. Personally however > if its a case of typing five characters (int) and saving a little exec > time, or typing 8 and losing a little, then I'd perfer to go with the > five an save the exec time. (int) is a casting operator and so doesn't incur function initialization overhead. Similarly using === null instead of is_null() has the same consequences. While the savings might seem paltry, knowing the difference between operator and functions and when you have both available for the same task can add up to real savings in a large application or in a heavily loaded system. I bet Rasmus makes a good distinction between the two when doing work for Yahoo :) Maybe not though, I've been wrong before ;) Cheers, Rob. -- .------------------------------------------------------------. | InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com | :------------------------------------------------------------: | An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting | | a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services | | such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn | | also provides an extremely flexible architecture for | | creating re-usable components quickly and easily. | `------------------------------------------------------------' -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
