On Mon, July 18, 2005 1:49 pm, Fredrik Tolf said: > very huge undertaking. I realize that Apache is huge, but that's just > because it has so insanely many features -- an HTTP server in itself > shouldn't need to be very complex, the way I see it. There are innumerable other HTTP servers. Some of them support PHP (and vice versa) to varying degrees. I know there were posts about at least *ONE* of them I recall I wanted to try "some day" and I'm pretty sure it was because that server gave you more control over the PHP User. Now, what the name of that server was, I have NO IDEA... It was probably about 2 or 3 years ago. I vaguely recall the name was maybe somehow related to "dragon" ??? At any rate: The web-servers PHP supports officially is pretty short, and you should check those out. There are probably a bunch MORE web-servers that claim to work "just fine" with PHP -- but possibly only as CGI, at which point suexec and the faithful standard Apache is probably a better idea anyway, unless you have more reasons not yet posted for dis-liking Apache. I don't think Apache really loads *that* much stuff in if you set yourself the goal of paring down your httpd.conf to the features you NEED. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
