On Saturday 23 April 2005 20:57, M Saleh EG wrote: > On 4/23/05, hanez <mailman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Saturday 23 April 2005 20:27, M Saleh EG wrote: > > > On 4/23/05, hanez <mailman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Saturday 23 April 2005 19:33, Reynier Perez Mira wrote: > > > > > Hi list: > > > > > > > > > > I have a problem with ASP .NET community in my Universty and I need > > > > to > > > > > > > solve it. The thing is that they say me that ASP .NET is better > > > > > than > > > > > > > > PHP, > > > > > > > > > so I need information to response they about this theme. Can you > > > > > put > > > > me > > > > > > > some sites, statics, intrview to big personalities, articles to > > > > > response > > > > > > > > My meaning about this: > > > > > > > > ASP .NET is not just a scripting language but more a plattform for > > > > Enterprise > > > > (web) applications. It really has many more features then PHP and i > > > > would > > > > > > compare ASP .NET more with JAVA/J2EE. I don't know much about ASP > > > > .NET since > > > > i am more familiar with PHP and maybe some little bit JAVA. I think > > > > it > > > > is > > > > > > better to compare with a scripting language like Python or Ruby. You > > > > could compare the old versions of ASP with PHP because this was > > > > nearly the same. I > > > > never have coded with ASP since i very rarely touch a windows box but > > > > it > > > > > > looked like VisualBasic code. > > > > > > > > Take a look here (Search Google: "asp .net vs php5" ): > > > > > > > > http://www.oracle.com/technology/pub/articles/hull_asp.html > > > > > > I don't recommand this article at Oracle at all!! > > > It's a very biased one and intends to misguide as a marketting gig. I'd > > > like you to read healthy articles that truely compare. BTW > > > ASP.net <http://ASP.net><http://ASP.net>can not be compared with PHP5 > > > > because they are > > > > > totaly different. > > > It's like comparing Apples and Oranges. PHP can be compared to ASP not > > > ASP.net <http://ASP.net> <http://ASP.net> because it's totaly a > > > > different thing. HTH. Been > > > > > there, done that. > > > > Okay, please read my post again! > > > > I would not compare PHP with ASP .NET. This is what i wrote. I found that > > link > > to Oracle within 5 seconds via Google and did not read the whole text but > > Reynier Perez Mira could understand the difference with it. > I did not say that you compared! Sorry if I put it that way. I said the > article at Oracle does that. > In all the cases that article does not fairly illustrate anything. It's a > merketing trick for novices! Okay, but it defenitly says this: <snip from=http://www.oracle.com/technology/pub/articles/hull_asp.html> The latest incarnation of ASP, ASP.NET, is not completely backward-compatible with previous versions of ASP, as it is a complete rewrite of the software. Previous ASP technology actually has a lot more in common with PHP than with ASP.NET, which is a complete framework for building Web applications. One of the principal features of this model is the flexibility to choose your programming language. ASP.NET works with scripted languages such as VBScript, JScript, Perlscript, and Python, as well as compiled languages such as VB, C#, C, Cobol, Smalltalk, and Lisp. The new framework uses the common language runtime (CLR); your language source is compiled into Microsoft Intermediate Language code, which the CLR then executes. </snip> This text says, that ASP .NET is a complete framework for building web applications. All the other stuff maybe is some marketing strategy for selling Oracle software but i don't take care about that. BTW, i think there is some more usefull information in this article (Anyway, i will not buy Oracle software). Sorry for starting this flamewar. This was not my goal... ;-) Regards -- Johannes Findeisen -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
