> > I do not question usefulness of include_once(). In fact, currently I'm > developing application that might use it exactly the way you described. > There are many API functions in several files, and there are cases when > I do not need all of them. That is exactly why I am concerned with it's > performance, and that is why I asked about it here. You can ask about a question. You can even try to improve the performance of a function. But at the end of the day unless you can come up with something that will do what the PHP community at large expects *and* it is faster it's not going to happen. Trust me, the core PHP dev team wants to improve performance just like you do. It's just that they also have to do silly little things like maintain BC. They'll break BC if there's a really, REALLY good reason why, but most of the time the answer is no. -- Teach a man to fish... NEW? | http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html STFA | http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-general&w=2 STFM | http://php.net/manual/en/index.php STFW | http://www.google.com/search?q=php LAZY | http://mycroft.mozdev.org/download.html?name=PHP&submitform=Find+search+plugins
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
